You are here

Pechnikov A.N., Yakuba G.A. Role of training level and creativity of the adjunct for the successful preparation and defense of the thesis

DOI: 10.34835/issn.2308-1961.2020.12.p159-167
 
Role of training level and creativity of the adjunct for the successful preparation and defense of the thesis
Andrey Nikolaevich Pechnikov, the doctor of pedagogical sciences, doctor of technical sciences, professor, Grigory Aleksandrovich Yakuba, the adjunct, Military Academy of Communications named after Marshal of the Soviet Union S.M. Budenny, St. Petersburg

Abstract
The research is aimed at identifying predictors of success in achieving by adjuncts (graduate students) the goal of passing state certification and the goal of defending a Ph.D. thesis. Statistically significant links have been established between the average grade of an adjunct's higher education diploma and the results of its intermediate and state certification in adjunct studies, as well as between the property of an adjunct's creativity and the timeliness of his thesis defense. The procedures for determining reliable models of the identified dependencies are described. The criterion validity of these models has been substantiated. An opinion was expressed about the expediency of diagnosing the property of creativity in applicants entering postgraduate studies (postgraduate studies).
Keywords: postgraduate study, postgraduate studies, certification, candidate dissertation, creativity, training.
 
References
  1. State Duma of the Russian Federation (2012), “About education in the Russian Federation” Federal Law of December 29, 2012 No. 273-FZ, available at: https://base.garant.ru/70291362/ (accessed 3 December 2020).
  2. State Duma of the Russian Federation (2020), “On amendments to certain legislative acts of the Russian Federation regarding the training of scientific and pedagogical personnel in graduate school (adjunct)”: bill No. 860618-7. available at: https://sozd.duma.gov.ru/bill/860618-7 (accessed 3 December 2020).
  3. Pechnikov, A.N. (2016), “On the fulfillment in education of the requirements formulated in the field of social management in the form of competencies”, Education and Science, No. 3 (132), pp. 4–28.
  4. Pechnikov, A.N. (2016), “On a unified approach to the interpretation of competencies in the field of social management and education”, Education and Science, No. 2 (131), pp. 4–17.
  5. Pechnikov, A.N., Avanesov, T.P. and Shikov, A.N. (2014), E-Learning: A Study, Military academy of communication, St. Petersburg.
  6. Pechnikov, A.N. and Prenzov, A.V. (2017), “Approach to assessing the formation of special competencies”, Education and Science, available at: No. 5 (19), pp. 28–54.
  7. Bespalko, V.P. (1977), Fundamentals of the theory of pedagogical systems, Voronezh University, Voronezh.
  8. The Government of Russian Federation (2013), "On the procedure for awarding academic degrees" (together with the "Regulations for the award of academic degrees"): Resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation of September 24, 2013 No. 842 (as amended on 01 November 2018, as amended from 26 May 2020), available at: http://ivo.garant.ru/#/document/70461216/paragraph/1:0/ (accessed 3 December 2020).
  9. Novikov, A.M. (2013), Foundations of pedagogy A guide for textbook authors and educators, Egves, Moscow.
  10. Platonov, K.K. (2016), Personality structure and development, Sciences, Moscow.
  11. Nasledov, A.D. (2011), SPSS 19: Professional Statistical Data Analysis, Sciences, St. Petersburg.
  12. Pechnikov, A.N., Prenzov, A.V. and Mashoshina, A.A. (2018), “On the features of the processes of forming abilities (special competencies)”, Education and Science, No. 1 (20), pp. 9–53.
  13. Pechnikov, A.N. (2020), “Methods for measuring professional abilities (competencies)”, Educational technologies and society, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 20–37.
  14. Pechnikov, A.N. and Prenzov, A.V. (2020), “The results of approbation of the methodology for measuring professional abilities and the revealed patterns of the formation of their individual levels”, Educational technology and society, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 38–50.
  15. Thinking and creativity test. Questionnaire Determination of types of thinking and level of creativity. Diagnostics according to J. Bruner's method, available at: https: https://www.liveinternet.ru/users/the_swan/post257725235 (date of access: 03.12.2020).
  16. Ostapenko, R.I. (2012), Multivariate Data Analysis for Psychologists: Study Guide, available at: https://www.twirpx.com/file/917809 (date of access: 03.12.2020).
  17. Shannon R. (1978), Simulation of systems – Art and science, Mir, Moscow.
Contact information: pan287@yandex.ru
Article arrived in edition 05.12.2020
Show full text