You are here

Osipov A.Yu., Prikhodov D.S., Vorontsov S.V., Shnarkin S.M., Sbrodov I.G. Evaluation of physical activity indicators of students practicing physical education programs of various types

DOI: 10.34835/issn.2308-1961.2020.4.p329-333
 
Evaluation of physical activity indicators of students practicing physical education programs of various types
Aleksander Yuryevich Osipov, the candidate of pedagogical sciences, senior lecturer, Siberian Federal University, Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk State Medical University named after professor V.F. Voyno-Yasenetsky, Siberian Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russia, Krasnoyarsk; Dmitriy Sergeevich Prikhodov, the candidate of pedagogical sciences, senior lecturer, Siberian Federal University, Krasnoyarsk; Krasnoyarsk State Medical University named after professor V.F. Voyno-Yasenetsky, Reshetnev Siberian State University Science of Technology, Krasnoyarsk; Sergey Vasilyevich Vorontsov, the senior teacher, Sergey Mikhaylovich Shnarkin, the senior teacher, Ivan Gennadyevich Sbrodov, the senior teacher, Siberian Federal University, Krasnoyarsk

Abstract
Introduction: the physical activity level of the significant part of Russian students does not correspond to the parameters recommended by scientists. Experts recommend significant increasing in the group of the modern students of the weekly physical activity level in sports and fitness. The aim of the study – to assess the degree of influence of various physical education programs on the students' weekly physical activity level. Methods and organization of the study: the participants – male students (n=138), practicing various physical education programs: sports specializations (n=83); modular (n=27) and mixed (n=28) training. During the study period (10 months), the students were divided into 5 approximately identical groups (G1–G5). All students submitted weekly reports on the physical education level in sports and fitness. To assess the physical fitness level of students the tests were used for strength, speed, and endurance. BMI data of all students have been recorded. Students used the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) template for self-assessment. Results: a significant (p<0.05) advantage in the results of physical fitness tests among students (G3 and G4), who had significantly (p<0.01) higher confirmed weekly physical activity level in sports and fitness was found. Students used various physical education programs: students (G3) – sports specializations; students (G4) – modular training. A significant (p<0.05) increase in students BMI (G1, G2, G5) with a confirmed physical activity of less than 350 minutes per week was revealed. Conclusions: the indicators of the students’ physical fitness level do not directly depend on the physical education program types. The significant impact of physical fitness level is exerted by the total volume of weekly physical activity in sports and fitness activities of male students.
Keywords: students, IPAQ, BMI, physical activity, sports specializations, physical fitness.
 
References
  1. Acampado, E. and Valenzuela, M. (2018), “Physical activity and dietary habits of Filipino college students: A cross-sectional study”, Kinesiology, No, 50 (1), pp. 57-67, DOI:10.26582/k.50.1.11.
  2. Lackman, J., Smith, M., and McNeill, E. (2015), “Freshman college students’ reasons for enrolling in and anticipated benefits from a basic college physical education activity course”, Frontiers in Public Health, No, 3, pp. 162, DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2015.00162.
  3. Masarykova, D., Labudova, J. and Matus I. (2016), “Physical activity of university students with various study profile”, Physical Activity Review, No. 4, pp. 107-114, DOI:10.16926/par.2016.04.13.
  4. Mehmeti, I. and Halilaj, B. (2018), “How to increase motivation for physical activity among youth”, Sport Mont, No. 16 (1), pp. 29-32, DOI: 10.26773/smj.180206.
  5. Osipov, A., Potop, V., Nagovitsyn, R., Zemba, E., Knyazev, A., et al. (2020), “Indicators of physical activity and fitness of male students at Russian universities”, Physical Education of Students, No. 24 (1), pp. 40-46, DOI:10.15561/20755279.2020.0105.
  6. Osipov, A., Ermakov, S., Gryzinky, V., Kudryavtsev, M., Bliznevsky, A., et al. (2018), “Analysis of the parameter changes of students’ physical development (at the age of 18–20) to identify the threat of increased body weight and obesity”, Journal of Physical Education and Sport, No. 18 (2), pp. 800-809, DOI:10.7752/jpes.2018.02118.
  7. Osipov, A., Kudryavtsev, M., Fedorova, P., Serzhanova, Z., Panov, E., et al. (2017), “Components of positive impact of exposure on university physical culture and sports on students' physical activity”, Journal of Physical Education and Sport, No. 17 (2), pp. 871-878, DOI:10.7752/jpes.2017.02133.
  8. Sember, V., Morrison, S., Jurak, G., Kovac, M. and Starc, G. (2018), “Differences in physical activity and academic performance between urban and rural schoolchildren in Slovenia”, Montenegrin Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, No. 7 (1), pp. 67-72, DOI:10.26773/mjssm.180309.
  9. Zagrevskaya, A. and Lubysheva, L. (2017), “Ontokinesilogical approach for sportization of physical education within national educational system”, Theory and practice of physical culture, No. 6, pp. 6–8.
Contact information: Ale44132272@ya.ru
Article arrived in edition 02.04.2020
Show full text