You are here

Polezhaeva O.N., Furaev A.N., Laptev A.V. Range of movement of the strike in two ways to swing in volleyball

DOI: 10.34835/issn.2308-1961.2020.7.p301-306
 
Range of movement of the strike in two ways to swing in volleyball
Olga Nikolaevna Polezhaeva, the post-graduate student, Alexander Nikolaevich Furaev, the candidate of pedagogical sciences, department chairman, Anatoly Vladimirovich Laptev, the candidate of pedagogical sciences, department chairman, Moscow State Academy of Physical Education

Abstract
The study compared the kinematics of the movement of the shock unit and the range of motion of the shoulder, in two main ways of performing the attack strike. Kinematic analysis was performed using the system of accelerometers that transmit three-dimensional image to the computer. The range of motion of the shoulder, linear and angular velocities was calculated. According to the data presented for each swing method, significant differences were observed in the maximum bending angles, angular and linear shoulder speeds. In each of the methods, high angular values of shoulder flexion during contact with the sword are shown, which puts high stress on the structure. However, shoulder flexion was significantly reduced when using the swing method, in which the shock link is held below the acromion.
Keywords: volleyball, attack hit, biomechanical analysis, range of motion.
 
References
  1. Zyubanova, I.A., Uskov, V.A. and Kapilevich, L.V. (2013), “Biomechanical model characteristics of performing an attacking stroke in volleyball”, Bulletin of Tomsk State University, No. 367, pp. 151-153.
  2. Blazevich, A. (2017), Sports Biomechanics: The Basics: Optimizing Human Performance, A and C Black Publishers Ltd, London.
  3. Bund, A., Ghorbani, S. and Rathjens, F.A. (2016), “Three-Dimensional Movement Analysis of the Spike in Fistball”, Sports (Basel, Switzerland), No. 4, pp. 55, DOI: 10.3390/sports4040055.
  4. Kugler, A., Kruger-Franke, M., Reininger, S., Trouillier, H. H., and Rosemeyer, B. (1996), “Muscular imbalance and shoulder pain in volleyball attackers”, British Journal of Sports Medicine, Vol. 30, pp. 256-259.
  5. Leonard, J. and Hutchinson, M.R. (2010), “Shoulder injuries in skeletally immature throwers: Review and current thoughts”, British Journal of Sports Medicine, Vol. 44, pp. 306-310.
  6. Meric, B. (2009), “3D kinematic analysis of overarm movements for different sports”, Kinesiology: International journal of fundamental and applied kinesiology, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 105-117.
  7. Reeser, J. and Glenn S. (2010), “Upper Limb Biomechanics During the Volleyball Serve and Spike”, Sports Health, Vol. 20, No. 5, pp. 368-374.
  8. Reham M. El-Raheem (2015), «Reliability of using Kinovea program in measuring dominant wrist joint range of motion», Trends in Applied Sciences Research, vol. 10, No. 4, P. 224, doi: 10.3923/tasr.2015.224.230
  9. Seminati, E. (2015), “Shoulder 3D range of motion and humerus rotation in two volleyball spike techniques: injury prevention and performance”, Sports Biomechanics, Vol. 2, No. 14, pp. 216-231, doi: 10.1080/14763141.2015.1052747.
  10. Serrien, B.A (2016), “Motion Analysis in the Volleyball Spike – Part 2: Coordination and Performance Variability”, International Journal of Human Movement and Sports Sciences, No. 4 (4), pp. 83-90, doi: 10.13189/saj.2016.040404
Contact information: olga.tchenichencko@gmail.com
Article arrived in edition 11.07.2020
Show full text